Reflexões sobre o alcance do direito ao silêncio e não autoincriminação
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article aims to critically and evaluatively analyze the scientific study on the relationship and confrontation of the limits of rights and constitutionally guarantee results related to procedural law and criminal material, which are: the right to silence and non-self-incrimination, with crime of perjury. It should be noted, in principle, that Brazilian legislation does not provide for the crime of perjury as a punishable practice, despite the fact that a bill for its creation has already been filed. With this in mind, it should be noted that during the processing of criminal actions under the national rules, the protection of in dubio pro reo is trained, as well as the guarantee of non-self-incrimination, the accused is not obliged, as well as the witnesses, to make a true commitment to the facts narrated, as well as he also reserves the right to silence without any prejudice. It is bibliographical research, using data through the analysis of national and international doctrines, laws and scientific articles. Thus, it sought to analyze the effective scope of the right to silence in the criminal sphere, comparing such limits as well, between the guarantee of non-self-incrimination and foreign literature on the crime of perjury.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
• The author (s) warrant that the contribution is original and unpublished and that it is not in the process of being evaluated in other journal (s);
• The journal is not responsible for the opinions, ideas and concepts issued in the texts, as they are the sole responsibility of the author (s);
• Publishers have the right to make textual adjustments and to adapt the article to the rules of publication.
Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows the sharing of work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are authorized to take additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg publish in institutional repository or as book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their work online (eg in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes as well as increase the impact and citation of the published work (See The Effect of Free Access) at http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
References
ALVES, Fabio Wellington Ataíde. O abuso da garantia de defesa no processo penal: a renovação da defesa penal protelatória. Revista Direito e Liberdade, Mossoró, v. 7, n 3, jul./dez., 2007.
BECCARIA, Cesare Bonesana, Marches di. Dos delitos e das penas. Tradução Torrieri Guimarães. São Paulo: Martin Claret, 2014.
BRASIL. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República, 1988. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/constituicao.htm. Acesso em: 15 jul. de 2020.
BRASIL. Decreto-Lei nº 3.689, de 3 de outubro de 1941. Código de Processo Penal., Brasília, DF: Presidência da República. Brasília, DF, Diário Oficial, 1941. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto-lei/del3689.htm. Acesso em: 16 ago. de 2020.
BRASIL. Supremo Tribunal Federal. Habeas Corpus n. 201912 DF. Rel. Min. Ricardo Lewandoswki. Brasília, 2021.
BRASIL. Tribunal Regional Federal da 4ª Região. ACR n. 50041554020144047107 RS. Rel. Sebastião Ogê Muniz. Porto Alegre, 2015.
GOIÁS. Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de Goiás. APR n. 04496065120128090044 FORMOSA. Rel. Itaney Francisco Campos. Goiânia, 2015.
LIMA, Renato Brasileiro de. Manual de Processo Penal: Salvador: Editora Juspodivm, 2020. v. único.
MARCONI, Marina Andrade de; PRESOTTO, Zélia Maria Neves. Antropologia: uma introdução. 7. ed. 7. Reimp. São Paulo: Atlas, 2015.
MATO GROSSO. Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Mato Grosso. APL n. 00085023320118110042 63187/2015. Rel. Orlando de Almeida Perri. Cuiabá, 2015.
MENDES, Gilmar Ferreira; BRANCO, Paulo Gustavo Gonet. Curso de direito constitucional. 14. ed. rev. e atual. São Paulo: Saraiva Educação, 2019.
MINAS GERAIS. Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de Minas Gerais. AGEPN n. 10024130863343001 MG. Rel. Júlio Cezar Guttierrez. Belo Horizonte, 2015.
STRECK, Lênio Luiz. Hermenêutica jurídica e(m) crise: uma exploração hermenêutica da construção do Direito. 11 ed. rev., atual. e ampl. Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado Edita, 2014.